Review of 2.5 MHz Acceleration in the Main Injector

Committee Report
Management Closeout


Meeting: Thursday, October 2, 2003
9:00am - noon
(9:00 - 10:30 Q&A, Discussions;
10:30 - 11:00 Committee Executive Session;
11:00 - 11:30 Closeout)
Venue: One North, WH1W

Note: No formal presentations are planned. The committee members should go through the document(s) provided and send questions/comments to the Chair and other members (cc:pushpa@fnal.gov) as soon as possible. The committee can ask supporting material to be presented at the meeting for clarification of specific issues.

Goal:

Scope and Technical review of the 2.5 MHz acceleration project in the MI

Desired outcome:

Decide whether to pursue the project, and assess the scope of the project

Review Committee:

Ralph Pasquinelli (Chair)
Mike Church
Don Edwards
Dave McGinnis
Claudio Rivetta

Charge:

The 2.5 MHz acceleration through transition in the Main Injector (MI) followed by a bunch rotation at a front porch at 27 GeV was proposed in the Recycler Technical Design Report as an alternative scheme for pbar coalescing. This new scheme is expected to reduce the longitudinal emittance blow-up to the order of 20% compared with the 70-100% blow-up with the current pbar coalescing.

Recently, with the implementation of a 2.5 MHz rpos feedback loop, beam was accelerated through transition without beam loss allowing the study and tuning of the whole procedure with both one and four 2.5 MHz bunches and different longitudinal emittances and intensities.

The committee is asked to review and comment on

  • the recent beam data and simulations of the 2.5 MHz acceleration scheme;
  • the suggested requirements on the allowable amplitude and phase of the 53 MHz and the 2.5/53MHz beamloading compensation needed for the successful implementation of the 2.5 MHz acceleration scheme for longitudinal emittances in the range of 0.8-2.2 eV-sec and intensities of 55-170E9 pbars/bunch.

    Finally, the committee is asked to assess the scope of the work required.

    The committee should provide a preliminary assessment at the closeout meeting following the review meeting. A final written report should be produced within a week of the review.


    Documents:

    Pbar acceleration in MI using 2.5 MHz and 53 MHz rf Systems
    Presentation Slides

    Comments from Reviewers:

    Committee Report:

    Outcome:


    Project Personnel:

    Ioanis Kourbanis - MI Dept. Head
    Chandrashekhara Bhat - Project Manager
    Vincent Wu -
    Brian Chase, Keith Meisner - LLRF
    Joe Dey - HLRF


    Review Contact: Pushpa Bhat

    Security, Privacy, Legal